In accordance with the provisions of Section 23, an agreement involving the violation of a person or the assets of a third party is null and void and cannot be invoked by court, so that no right to violate such an illegal agreement can be considered bearable. A simple agreement was reached between the parties to defer the registration of the rent of the facts. In such cases where the known amdani was concealed in order to reduce the assessment of property income, the court considered that this was the repeal of the provisions of the Registration Act, Desstamp Act and Transfer of Property Act. [35] The distinction between illegal and non-legal contracts is very thin, but it is there. The law can either prohibit the agreement or it can only say that if it is done, the courts will not enforce it. In the first case, it is zero in the latter case; Nutan Kumar v. IInd District of Additional Judge, Banda, AIR 1994 All 298. After all, it is something that has value in the eyes of the law. [4] There can never be a simple payment of money.

[5] This is why the Indian Contracts Act uses the term “any action or abstinence” to show what is being considered against a consideration. [6] 11. the form of the agreement and the agreement of the parties over-govern the law The transfer of the house would also be non-confessable, since s s of immorality, if the idea was to open a brothel. [61] In such a situation, parties who have not been in a delicto bet may sue for expulsion. [62] (f) A promises for B a job in the public service and B promises to pay 1,000 rupees to A. The agreement is null and forth, because the consideration is illegal. On the other hand, if agricultural land was transferred within 15 years, it was invalidated. The only reason is that the Karnataka Land Reforms Act of 1981 provided for the same thing. [28] Similarly, the sale of Paddy above the maximum price set under the Maximum Price Regulation was found to be unlawful. [29] Only with the five conditions would the agreement be transformed into a contract. [15] For the purposes of this article, the focus would be on the aspect of observation.

As the provision shows, the consideration must be legal. The question now is what the consideration would be legal and when. (i) A`s estate is sold for the proceeds of the delay, under a statutory law prohibiting the late acquisition of the estate. B becomes buyer after agreement with A and agrees to pass on the estate has. I .C to A after receiving the price he paid. The agreement is not valid because it would make the transaction a late purchase, which would nullify the purpose of the law. In each of these cases, the review or the purpose of an agreement is classified as illegal.